Christian Medial Fellowship
Printed from: https://www.cmf.org.uk/resources/publications/content/?context=article&id=1232
close
CMF on Facebook CMF on Twitter CMF on YouTube RSS Get in Touch with CMF
menu resources
ss triple helix - autumn 2002,  GMC Guidance - A big improvement on the first draft

GMC Guidance - A big improvement on the first draft

The General Medical Council finally published its guidance on withdrawing treatment in August 2002 after a consultation period of over a year. The final version of Withholding and Withdrawing Life-prolonging Treatments: Good practice in Decision-making is a far more balanced document than the original draft, and a considerable improvement on the BMA's own guidance published in June1999. The BMA guidance condoned the withdrawal of artificial nutrition or hydration from patients who have suffered a 'serious stroke or have severe dementia', with the agreement of a 'senior clinician'. Many felt this gave doctors a licence to starve or dehydrate seriously brain-damaged (though not terminally ill) patients to death; and the Scottish Deputy Minister for Community Care, Iain Gray, had accordingly warned that 'To withdraw hydration and nutrition from a non-PVS patient with the purpose of hastening death would leave a medical practitioner open to criminal prosecution.' (Triple Helix 2000; Summer:3)

The GMC guidance, by contrast makes it clear that when death is not imminent, artificial nutrition or hydration can only be withdrawn in circumstances where 'the patient's condition is so severe, and the prognosis so poor that providing artificial nutrition or hydration may cause suffering, or be too burdensome in relation to the possible benefits.'(Para 81)

This should provide a safeguard against the slippery slope that could follow if doctors start to treat thirst and hunger (or the confusion caused by them) with sedation rather than food and fluids. We were also pleased to see provision for juniors conscientiously to object to being executives for non-treatment decisions that they believe are unethical or morally wrong (Para 29) without being forced to participate by personally delegating the task to others.

The fact that the guidance has substantially changed for the better is a further encouragement to ensure that we continue to participate at all possible levels in such discussions. The CMF submission to the consultation is still available on our website at www.cmf.org.uk/ethics/submissions/?id=19

Christian Medical Fellowship:
uniting & equipping Christian doctors & nurses
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instgram
Contact Phone020 7234 9660
Contact Address6 Marshalsea Road, London SE1 1HL
© 2024 Christian Medical Fellowship. A company limited by guarantee.
Registered in England no. 6949436. Registered Charity no. 1131658.
Design: S2 Design & Advertising Ltd   
Technical: ctrlcube