Concerning news from Scotland: the ‘Conversion Therapy’ ban

Last year the Scottish parliament ran a consultation [1] seeking views on how they should respond to a petition ‘Calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to ban the provision or promotion of LGBT+ conversion therapy in Scotland‘. [2] Later in the year, Westminster also launched a consultation on the topic. CMF responded to both consultations.[3]

We and many of our partner organisations pointed out that both consultations lacked any definition of the term ‘conversion therapy’, but made the assumption that anything coming under this banner is inherently harmful. For example, the Westminster consultation began by saying: ‘The Government will ban conversion therapy. There is no justification for these coercive and abhorrent practices‘. [4] The consultations also offered little reassurance for counsellors, medical practitioners, or church leaders that their normal work of supporting people to explore questions of sexuality and gender would be protected.

The glimmer of light in this is that CMF and other Christian organisations weren’t the only ones highlighting these problems. Most notable was the response by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), the first of several high-profile organisations to leave LGBTQ+ charity Stonewall’s ‘Diversity Champions’ scheme last year. [5],[6],[7] The EHRC raised many of the same concerns as we did, and noted: ‘The legislation must be carefully drafted in order not to catch legitimate and appropriate counselling, therapy or support which enables a person to explore their sexual orientation or gender dysphoria, and to avoid criminalising mainstream religious practice such as preaching, teaching and praying about sexual ethics.’ [8]

While the Government Equalities Office in England has appeared to listen carefully to our concerns, in Scotland, the situation looks much more serious. Holyrood will shortly debate a report produced by the Equalities Committee presenting its findings following the consultation. [9] That report calls for a ‘fully comprehensive‘ ban, covering ‘sexual orientation and gender identity, including trans identities, for both adults and children in all settings without exception and include “consensual” conversion practices.’ It commends the legislation in Victoria, Australia [10] – the most far-reaching in the world to date – as ‘one of the best practice examples‘.

This is of deep concern. We are working with partner organisations to ask MSPs to ensure that any bill targets only genuinely harmful practices and provides for parents, pastors, and healthcare professionals to operate in line with orthodox Christian teaching on these issues.

References